A leadership team sets an ambitious revenue target. The organisation responds with more sales activity, new market ideas, product launches and expansion plans. Each initiative sounds reasonable. Yet, after several review cycles, progress remains uneven.
The problem may not be a lack of effort. It may be that the organisation has started with a target before understanding the situation that stands between the business and that target.
A growth target describes where leaders want to go. A diagnosis explains what must change for the business to get there.
Targets do not explain constraints
A company may want to double revenue, enter a new geography or improve margins. Those ambitions do not identify the obstacle that matters most.
Perhaps demand exists, but the business cannot deliver consistently. Perhaps it has technical capability but no route to the budget owner. Perhaps its products are attractive but its economics are weak. Perhaps it has too many customer-specific projects and insufficient capacity to build a repeatable offer.
Each situation requires a different response. More sales activity will not solve a delivery constraint. New product development will not necessarily solve a purchasing-access problem. A cost programme may damage the capabilities needed to enter a higher-value segment.
Without diagnosis, leaders risk treating symptoms as the problem.
Diagnose the challenge that shapes the rest
A useful diagnosis is not a long inventory of every weakness. It identifies the few conditions that most influence the organisation's ability to succeed in the situation it faces.
That requires examining the external context, the business's position, the sources of performance and the constraints that connect them. It also requires distinguishing causes from symptoms. A declining win rate may be a symptom of weak differentiation, poor qualification, uncompetitive economics or a mismatch between the offer and the buyer's requirements.
The diagnosis should make the situation easier to understand. If it simply repeats the target in different words—“we need to grow faster”—it has not done its job.
Let the diagnosis shape the choice
Once the central challenge is understood, leaders can establish a guiding approach and a set of coherent actions. The approach should address the challenge directly. The actions should reinforce it.
For example, a technology supplier may discover that it is not losing because its product is inferior, but because buyers perceive adoption risk. The strategic response may be to focus on a narrower application, strengthen validation evidence and create a deployment model that reduces customer risk. A broad price-reduction programme would address the visible symptom of lost deals without necessarily addressing the underlying cause.
The point is not that every company should follow the same pattern. It is that actions must be selected in relation to the diagnosis.
Test the strategy for coherence
Ask whether the chosen approach resolves the central challenge, whether the actions support one another and whether resource allocation reflects the choices. If the business says a segment is the priority but continues to allocate most engineering capacity to unrelated custom work, the strategy is not yet coherent in practice.
Also ask what the business will stop, defer or decline. A strategy that adds priorities without removing conflicts may simply increase organisational load.
The strategic implication
A growth target can motivate an organisation, but it cannot substitute for strategic reasoning. Before deciding how much to grow, leaders need to understand what is constraining growth and which choices can change that condition.
The first question of strategy is therefore not, “What number should we pursue?” It is, “What is really going on, and what is the central challenge we must address?”
Related reading
- The Opportunity Cost of Saying Yes to Every Adjacent Market
- A Good Outcome Does Not Prove It Was a Good Decision
Continue exploring this collection: Strategy — The Power of a Moat
Browse all articles · Ideas & Insights
Interested in the decisions behind technology-led growth? Explore Work With Me →
Continue reading in this collection
Why Focus Can Produce Disproportionate Returns
Focus can deepen knowledge and capability faster than spreading scarce resources across a much larger market.
Read article →
Find the Asymmetry Hidden in the Customer's Value Chain
A supplier can create disproportionate value by solving an overlooked problem at a critical point in the customer's wider value chain.
Read article →
Turn Constraints Into Strategic Design Choices
Constraints can shape a focused business model when leaders design around limited capital, capacity and market access.
Read article →