A challenger studies the market leader and sees a familiar picture: broader distribution, stronger brand recognition, larger production capacity and deeper customer relationships. It may try to match those strengths, usually with fewer resources.
A more promising analysis asks a different question: where does the incumbent's existing model make certain customer needs difficult or unattractive to serve?
A structural weakness is not simply a poor product or a weak sales team. It is a constraint created by the incumbent's current economics, commitments, processes or strategic choices.
Strengths can create constraints
A broad portfolio can make it difficult to prioritise a narrow application. A large installed base can make rapid product changes complex. A standardised service model can be uneconomic for a small but specialised customer group. A cost structure designed for high-volume orders may not suit low-volume, high-complexity work.
These conditions are not universal, and they do not mean every large company is slow or inflexible. They are hypotheses to investigate by observing what the incumbent serves well, what it avoids and where its operating model creates friction for customers.
Look for repeated customer compromises
Customers may accept an incumbent's limitations because alternatives are weak or because changing suppliers is costly. But repeated compromises can reveal an opening.
Listen for problems such as long engineering-change cycles, limited configuration options, service gaps, inflexible minimum order quantities, slow qualification support or poor attention to a specialised use case. The important question is whether the problem is significant enough to justify a customer changing behaviour.
A challenger should not enter merely because the incumbent has a gap. It must be able to serve that gap with a credible offer and sustainable economics.
Build a position around the mismatch
Suppose an incumbent's business is organised around standard, high-volume components. A specialist may find an opportunity in an application that needs smaller volumes, closer engineering collaboration and more responsive change management.
The specialist should design its operating model for that segment rather than reproduce the incumbent's volume economics. It may need different pricing, customer selection, engineering routines and supplier relationships.
The asymmetry is created by the fit between the challenger and the underserved need—not by an assumption that the incumbent is incompetent.
Expect the incumbent to respond
If the segment becomes attractive, the incumbent may adjust its model, acquire a specialist or use its distribution reach to enter. The challenger should therefore consider what it can build through learning and repetition before the opportunity attracts a direct response.
Can it accumulate application knowledge? Become qualified in critical customer processes? Build a service model with attractive economics? Create a capability combination that is costly to reproduce? These may turn an initial opening into a more durable position.
The strategic implication
A competitor's size and strengths should not be studied only as barriers. They can also reveal the constraints created by the incumbent's chosen model.
The leadership question is: “Which important customer need is underserved because of how the incumbent is organised—and can we serve it profitably in a way that reinforces our own position?”
Related reading
- Where to Play When You Cannot Outspend the Incumbent
- Find the Asymmetry Hidden in the Customer's Value Chain
Continue exploring this collection: Strategy — The Power of a Moat
Browse all articles · Ideas & Insights
Interested in the decisions behind technology-led growth? Explore Work With Me →
Continue reading in this collection
Why Focus Can Produce Disproportionate Returns
Focus can deepen knowledge and capability faster than spreading scarce resources across a much larger market.
Read article →
Find the Asymmetry Hidden in the Customer's Value Chain
A supplier can create disproportionate value by solving an overlooked problem at a critical point in the customer's wider value chain.
Read article →
Turn Constraints Into Strategic Design Choices
Constraints can shape a focused business model when leaders design around limited capital, capacity and market access.
Read article →